By Andrea Basche, UCS Kendall Science Fellow
In the theme of troubling trends for climate adaptation, and as one of UCS’s agricultural experts, I want to talk about a biome you probably remember from middle school science — the grasslands — and why it is so important to protect them.
Grasslands might seem self-explanatory, but are much more exciting than the straightforward name implies. Quite simply, they are open areas of grass (and occasional trees) located in the mid-latitude regions across the globe. They’re found in areas with more rain than the desert and less than the tropics, and as a result, are ideal places for humans to inhabit.
We use grasslands for many purposes, from raising livestock to providing recreational space to protecting wildlife. The US Forest Service outlines a host of grasslands benefits, but the ones I want to focus on are related to climate.
Grasslands & Climate Change
Grasslands provide protection against floods and droughts, have the potential to store carbon in the soil, and in turn, help increase overall climate stability. Compared to crops that need to be planted every year (annual crops such as corn and wheat), grasslands do not require chemical and water inputs.
This post is part of a series on Planning Failures: The Costly Risks of Ignoring Climate Change.
In short, using grasslands for things like wildlife habitat or grazing animals (like cattle), which eat the grass and convert it to human food, is often less resource intensive than agricultural systems featuring annual crops, which might not be as well suited a use for such environments.
You might be thinking: Shouldn’t we be protecting grasslands if they provide so many climate benefits? The obvious answer is yes, but let me use a few maps and graphs to illustrate what is really happening.
The Problem: Grasslands Are Disappearing
Our nation’s remaining grasslands are largely concentrated in the Great Plains and Intermontane West regions, and are actually disappearing at an alarming rate.
The Washington Post recently published a comprehensive piece on this trend, noting that the confluence of biofuel expansion, improved crop genetics, a longer growing season (due to climate change), as well as the oil boom in North Dakota, contributed to a precipitous decline of grasslands.
As an agricultural scientist concerned with climate impacts, the Post coverage reminded me that scientists from South Dakota State University reported in 2013 that the rate of grassland loss (because of conversion to annual crops such as corn and soybeans) from 2006-2011 was comparable to that of tropical deforestation in Indonesia, Malaysia and Brazil.
It’s also becoming increasingly clear that the loss of grasslands has grave impacts for biodiversity.Grasslands are essential to #biodiversity + their loss is impacting #climatechange. Click To Tweet
Crops Replacing Grasslands
Tyler Lark and colleagues from the University of Wisconsin tracked land and planting patterns dating back to the 1970s across the lower 48 states, using U.S. Department of Agriculture data. They found that during the period of 2008-2012, large swaths of new ground were cultivated or plowed and planted to annual crops for the first time. Most of this land was in the center of the United States — the Great Plains states and western stretches of the Corn Belt. They also calculated that the majority of newly cultivated cropland was from — you guessed it — grasslands. In fact, this extends the pattern of cropland establishment in the U.S., since most of today’s Corn Belt replaced grasslands and prairies.
What crops replaced the grasslands? The next map illustrates that there are several crops that took their place, including cotton in western Texas, wheat in the southern Great Plains, and corn and soybean in the northern Great Plains.
This is the opposite of what climate adaptation ought to look like.
This is an alarming trend because we need grasslands for climate adaptation (buffering floods and droughts) as well as for carbon storage and mitigation. It is also alarming because the crops that are replacing grasslands require more water.
These three US Department of Agriculture maps, which trace irrigated crops, line up oh-so well with those that are replacing grasslands. So in essence, we’re trading grasslands that do not require extra water for crops that need irrigation to survive, a counter-intuitive move, particularly in areas where irrigation and drinking water supplies are dwindling.
It is further troubling because of what the past climate record and future predictions tell us. Across the lower 48 states, the areas where grasslands are being lost are the same ones where flood frequency has increased the most, and soil moisture is predicted to decline the most.This is NOT what #climate adaptation should look like #climatechange Click To Tweet
It is further troubling because of what the past climate record and future predictions tell us. Across the lower 48 states, the areas where grasslands are being lost are the same ones where flood frequency has increased the most, and soil moisture is predicted to decline the most.
Map 8. Source: National Climate Assessment
Current Policy: Helping or Hurting Grasslands Protection?
The USDA spends billions of dollars every year on conservation programs that are meant to protect areas such as grasslands. Unfortunately, funding for such programs has fallen flat over the last many number of years. And because of many confounding factors — including a bubble in commodity prices due to the ethanol boom — grasslands protected by the USDA’s Conservation Reserve Program have transitioned out of the program.
One policy initiative intended to help protect grasslands is the Sodsaver Provision, an addition to the 2014 Farm Bill. It was meant to limit crop insurance subsidies available to producers who planted crops on previously uncultivated land (or native sod) in specific Upper Midwest and Plains states, where wetlands and grasslands are abundant (the region highlighted in red in Map 2).
However, as our colleagues at the National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition have noted, there are many shortcomings in the rule as currently written and administered. As its currently being interpreted by the USDA, it would inadequately collect and report information on newly plowed lands and still includes a provision that would allow insurance to kick in after four years if newly plowed lands were first planted to non-insured crops. Both of those issues almost defeat the purpose of the provision.
Broader Agricultural Adaptation Initiatives
It’s worth mentioning a few promising climate change adaptation policies on the horizon. Earlier this year, the USDA released its Building Blocks for Climate Smart Agriculture & Forestry framework, which includes grasslands protection principles such as conservation of sensitive lands and grazing lands. California Congressman Jared Huffman introduced the Healthy Soils and Rangelands Solution Act, which would establish a competitive grant program for activities that store carbon in the soil, including management of grazing lands. Further, California’s Department of Food and Agriculture established the Healthy Soils Initiative to help producers achieve soil sustainability and climate change resilience through financing opportunities and further research.
There are many other programs funded by the Farm Bill that seek to optimize agricultural land management — including grasslands — for climate benefit. Unfortunately they are woefully under-funded. The National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition outlined a number existing Farm Bill programs that seek to improve soil health, increase carbon stored by soil and help strengthen climate resilience. All could benefit from increased funding. The Congressional Research Service reports that these programs often have demand from farmers that far exceeds the monies that Congress makes available. For example, popular programs such as the Environmental Quality Incentives Program and the Conservation Stewardship Program fund approximately half of the applications they receive. Crop insurance, on the other hand, is available to 100% of eligible producers who sign up and works more like a blank check without any payment caps.
So, although policies have tried to help protect grasslands and strengthen agricultural resilience to climate change, there is a lot more work to be done. With increasing climate impacts, time is of the essence.Could we be creating another #dustbowl? #climatechange Click To Tweet
Could We Be Creating Another Dust Bowl?
A bit of history to close: the infamous, expensive, and painfully detrimental Dust Bowl of the 1930s resulted from a confluence of climate and economic drivers. Note: If you want to better understand the human impact, I recommend Timothy Eganís excellent book The Worst Hard Time or Ken Burnsí documentary mini-series The Dust Bowl. Given a similar intersection of climate and economic factors at present, scientists now speculate that we could be headed for another Dust Bowl.
We now know clearly how to avoid such a scenario by focusing on protecting sensitive and important regions like grasslands. This is ever more important given the climate change trends already surrounding us and affecting our food and agriculture system. Policies designed to protect sensitive ecosystems such as grasslands ought to be prioritized in a responsible, comprehensive manner. As outlined in the Toward Climate Resilience report, such policies should incorporate a systems approach and reflect a long-term vision, one that protects climate buffering landscapes.
What are your thoughts on the effects of climate change due to the destruction of grasslands? Please share in the comments below!
*This article originally appeared on the Union Of Concerned Scientists Blog.
Climate Change And Wine: Should We Be Preparing For A “Grape-ocalypse”? [Blog Inspiration]
This Changes Everything: Capitalism vs. The Climate by Simon & Schuster [Great Reads]
Save 10% On Priority Pass Membership [Travel Deals]
Latest posts by Jessica Festa (see all)
- This Recipe Sharing Platform Supports Women In The Culinary Industry (Labneh Recipe Included!) - Nov 5, 2020
- Hiking The Mohare Danda Community Eco-Trek In Nepal - Jun 3, 2020
- 6 Important Questions For Choosing A Responsible Yoga Retreat - May 18, 2020
- How To Create & Grow A Profitable Blogging Business (Ethically) - Jan 18, 2020
- Exploring Historic England By Train [5-Day itinerary] - Oct 24, 2019
The global warming that we had at the end of last century was part of normal climate cycles. Doctor David Evans wondered why temperatures this century hardly changed. He was a former climate modeller for the Australian Greenhouse Office and has six degrees in applied mathematics.
So he studied the global climate change model. The model was correct – but there were two errors in the mathematics. As a result, the calculations overestimated the effect of carbon dioxide by one order of magnitude. Oops!
The reason why the temperature hasn’t changed much this century is that the big cycle that lasts several hundred years reached its peak at the start of the century. As you know, the top of a sine wave is nearly flat, so the temperature didn’t change much. As we move further from the peak temperatures, the rate of cooling will accelerate.
And this is published in which peer-reviewed journal, Ian?